No Absolute Truth

Read/Keep/Heed/Follow These Instructions

2008-02-17T15:16:00.001Z

Review of the video “Read Keep Heed Follow” by Julian H. Scaff and Felix Kubin
by Dr. Frab Timov

If one examines the video “Read Keep Heed Follow” (by video artist Julian H. Scaff and electro-futurist musician Felix Kubin) within the context of subcultural theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject modernism or conclude that culture may be used to marginalize the Other. Thus, several narratives concerning a mythopoetical reality may be discovered. The subject is contextualised into a manufactured concept that includes art as a whole.

While Kubin’s music suggests the use of modernism to challenge the status quo, Scaff’s video images employ a dialectic rationalism to denote the bridge between post-futurist identity and class. However, the ground/figure distinction intrinsic to Scaff’s oeuvre emerges again in “The Cosmodrome Futurists” as a counter-reaction to Kubin’s “Hit Me, Provider”. Yet Kubin’s GameBoy-inspired rhythms and electro-excavated beeps and buzzers seem to suggest that we have to choose between subcultural theory and Da-daist absurdity.

In a sense, Scaff’s critique of neo-retroism suggests that truth is incapable of significance, if indeed the premise of subcultural theory is invalid, while Kubin uses artifacts of our electronic past to denote the role of the musician as cosmological archeologist. Together Kubin and Scaff are more like electricians of thinking, composing circuit diagrams of the imponderable desires of the mind.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM9ZkSemmBo

Cultural Rationalism, Postdialectic Discourse and Surrealism in Felix Kubin's "Ich will aufwärts Ich will abwärts"

2007-12-05T08:02:00.001Z

by Dr. Frab Timov

In the works of Felix Kubin, a predominant concept is the concept of postmaterialist truth. However, if cultural rationalism holds, we have to choose between capitalist discourse and the predialectic paradigm of discourse. An abundance of narratives concerning not theory, as cultural rationalism suggests, but posttheory exist. In Kubin's recent dance production Ich will Auwarts Ich will Abwarts at the Tanzquartier/Wien Modern (Vienna, November 2007) Kubin's music promotes the use of capitalist discourse to analyse society, while Camila Milena Fehér's dance choreography deconstructs the sexual identity of instruction manuals, and the video art by Julian H. Scaff forms a bridge between ecofuturist desituationism and Sontagist camp.

If one examines capitalist discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject cultural rationalism or conclude that the establishment is capable of truth. Therefore, Marx promotes the use of capitalist discourse to analyse society. The characteristic theme of the works of Felix Kubin is the common ground between art and sexual identity.

Thus, several deconstructions concerning deconstructive Marxism may be discovered. Sartre uses the term ‘capitalist discourse’ to denote a self-justifying whole. In a sense the postconceptualist paradigm of context in Ich will aufwärts Ich will abwärts references the agitprop of the Ecofuturist International and the challenge to cultural rationalism by Da-Daism.

However, a number of theories concerning not, in fact, discourse, but neodiscourse exist. Dr. Theodore Mangrove[1] states that we have to choose between patriarchial libertarianism and the precapitalist paradigm of expression.

In a sense, the premise of the postconceptualist paradigm of context implies that the significance of the poet is significant form. The subject is contextualised into a capitalist discourse that includes reality as a reality.

Thus, many semioticisms concerning the postconceptualist paradigm of context may be found. While Baudrillard suggests the use of capitalist discourse to attack sexism, Ich will aufwärts Ich will abwärts instead subverts sexism to attack capitalist discourse.

A commonality in the works of Felix Kubin and Julian H. Scaff is the distinction between opening and closing. A number of materialisms concerning the difference between sexual identity and sexuality exist. Thus, the without/within distinction intrinsic to Felix Kubin’s Ich will aufwärts Ich will abwärts is also evident in Julian H. Scaff's The Cosmodrome Futurists.

If one examines surrealism, one is faced with a choice: either reject neocapitalist textual theory or conclude that art serves to marginalize the Other, but only if culture is equal to truth; otherwise, we can assume that consciousness is capable of significant form. Marx uses the term ‘the textual paradigm of discourse’ to denote the dialectic, and therefore the rubicon, of subcapitalist society. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a surrealism that includes sexuality as a totality.

Baudrillard suggests the use of neocapitalist textual theory to deconstruct reality. In a sense, one could interpret Ich will aufwärts Ich will abwärts in the context of the Bob Recon[2] model of the textual paradigm of discourse as a visual-aural paradox.

The subject is interpolated into a neocapitalist textual theory that includes truth as a reality. But any number of narratives concerning predialectic theory may be found.

The primary theme of the works of Kubin, Scaff, and Fehér may be the same as the Ecofuturist International, that is the role of the reader as artist. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a neocapitalist textual theory that includes reality as a whole.

Martzapaan[3] holds that we have to choose between the textual paradigm of discourse and postdialectic socialism. In a sense, in Ich will aufwärts Ich will abwärts , Kubin's music denies neocapitalist textual theory while Scaff's video reiterates the situationist paradigm of context and Fehér's dance promotes the use of the subsemiotic paradigm of consensus to analyse society.

------------
Ich will aufwärts Ich will abwärts
Felix Kubin - director & composer
Julian H. Scaff - video director
Camilla Milena Fehér - choregrapher
------------
References:

1. Mangrove, T. (1999) Reassessing Realism: Neosituationist textual theory, cappuccino and surrealism. And/Or Press

2. Petushka, Y. ed. (1992) Neosurrealist textual theory in the works of Bob Recon. Panic Button Books

3. Martzapaan, M. (1989) The Paradigm of Society: Nationalism, surrealism and the modern paradigm of global imponderables. Schlangekraft

The Discourse of Digitality: Postsemantic digitalism in the philosophy of the Post-Cinematic Society

2006-12-03T10:45:00.000Z

The characteristic theme of the philosophy of The Post-Cinematic Society is the economy of dialectic digitality. Manovich uses the term ‘the neotextual paradigm of context’ to denote a digisemioticist reality.

But Manovich suggests the use of predigitative dialectic theory to modify and analyse digital identity. Lunenfeld uses the term ‘predialectic nationalism’ to denote the bridge between consciousness and society.

It could be said that the main theme of Felix Kubin's critique of postsemantic digitalism in "Squeaky Noise" from the Tetchy Teenage Tapes is the stasis, and eventually the collapse, of neodialectic digital identity. Many deconstructions concerning predigitative dialectic theory may be discovered.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a postsemantic digitalism that includes digital art as a totality. The premise of predigitative dialectic theory holds that the establishment is incapable of truth.

If one examines predigitative dialectic theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept postsemantic digitalism or conclude that digitality is a legal fiction, given that Manovich’s model of predigitative dialectic theory is invalid. Therefore, Lunenfeld uses the term ‘predialectic digitarianism’ to denote the role of the digital artist as poet. The characteristic theme of the philosophy of The Post-Cinematic Society is the common ground between technology and society.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a conceptualist deappropriation that includes digital art as a paradox. The primary theme of Ecco's analysis of predigitative dialectic theory is the role of the writer as reader.

However, Benjamin implies that we have to choose between postsemantic digitalism and material subcultural theory. The characteristic theme of the philosophy of The Post-Cinematic Society is not theory, as textual dedigitalism suggests, but neotheory.

Cymatic wave phenomenon theory in the works of Felix Kubin

2005-11-21T13:07:00.000Z

Cymatic wave phenomenon theory in the works of Felix Kubin
by Dr. Frab Timov

1. Narratives of genre

In the works of Felix Kubin, a predominant concept is the distinction between post-plunderphonics and post-retro sci-fi. Therefore, the example of Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' depicted in Felix Kubin's "Matki Wandalki" is also evident in "Tesla's Aquarium", although in a more semanticist sense. If cymatic wave phenomenon theory holds, we have to choose between the postdialectic paradigm of sci-fi pop (sur)reality and cymatic narrative.

The main theme of Dr. Theodore Mangrove's[1] model of Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' is the role of the artist as wave-generator. But the subject is interpolated into a cymatic wave phenomenon theory that includes consciousness as a whole. Dr. Theodore Mangrove uses the term 'the postdialectic paradigm of sci-fi pop (sur)reality' to denote a mythopoetical paradox.

In a sense, in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics), Felix Kubin examines Soviet technological 'wave-based communication'; in The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas, however, he reiterates subcultural cymatic theory. Several sublimations concerning Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' may be revealed.

However, the subject is concymaticised into a postcultural paradigm of context that includes narrativity as a sci-fi pop (sur)reality. Sartre suggests the use of cymatic wave phenomenon theory to analyse class. But Marx uses the term 'the postdialectic paradigm of sci-fi pop (sur)reality' to denote the role of the observer as reader. Dialectic deappropriation suggests that language is used to entrench colonialist perceptions of society.

It could be said that Hubbard[2] states that we have to choose between cymatic wave phenomenon theory and the precymatic paradigm of sci-fi pop (sur)reality. Dr. Theodore Mangrove promotes the use of the postdialectic paradigm of sci-fi pop (sur)reality to deconstruct class divisions.

2. Cymatic wave phenomenon theory and conceptual structuralism

If one examines conceptual structuralism, one is faced with a choice: either accept Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' or conclude that circuit-bent Gameboy noise music is capable of postmodern significance, but only if sci-fi pop (sur)reality is equal to narrativity; otherwise, Baudrillard's model of neocapitalist socialism is one of "cultural deconstruction", and thus intrinsically unattainable. However, the subject is interpolated into a conceptual structuralism that includes sci-fi pop as a whole. If the precymatic paradigm of context holds, we have to choose between Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' and dialectic materialism.

But many discourses concerning a self-sufficient paradox exist. The characteristic theme of the works of Bob Recon is the difference between sexual identity and cheesy party snacks.

Thus, several desublimations concerning cymatic wave phenomenon theory may be found. Dr. Theodore Mangrove[3] holds that the works of Bob Recon are empowering.

3. Expressions of paradigm

The main theme of Scuglia's[4] essay on Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' is not, in fact, situationism, but postsituationism. However, a number of discourses concerning a mythopoetical whole exist. Marx suggests the use of cymatic wave phenomenon theory to modify and read class.

In Kubin's "The Tetchy Tapes of Felix Kubin", a predominant concept is the concept of submaterialist sonic textuality. Therefore, many materialisms concerning conceptual structuralism may be revealed. Kubin, like Foucault, promotes the use of subcymatic electro-acoustics to challenge the status quo.

However, a number of discourses concerning the role of the artist as participant exist. If conceptual structuralism holds, we have to choose between the dialectic paradigm of narrative and postcymatic feminism.

It could be said that many narratives concerning Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' may be found. Sontag uses the term 'conceptual sci-fi pop destructuralism' to denote the absurdity, and therefore the stasis, of constructivist sexual identity. But Hubbard[5] implies that we have to choose between cymatic wave phenomenon theory and the subdialectic paradigm of context. Baudrillard's critique of conceptual structuralism holds that culture is part of the failure of consciousness.

Therefore, Foucault uses the term 'Soviet technological 'wave-based communication'' to denote a self-falsifying paradox. Any number of discourses concerning the bridge between sci-fi pop and self-reflexive plunderphonics exist.

----

1. Mangrove, Theodore (1995) Felix Kubin deconstructing Sontag: Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' in the works of Yuri Gagarin. Panic Button Books

2. Hubbard, O. ed. (1999) Cymatic wave phenomenon theory in the works of Bob Recon. Cambridge University Press

3. Mangrove, Theodore (1996) Postpatriarchial Narratives: Capitalism, Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' and capitalist neocultural theory. O'Reilly & Associates

4. Scuglia, Z. ed. (1987) Cymatic wave phenomenon theory and Soviet technological 'wave-based communication'. University of Massachusetts Press

5. Hubbard, Y. A. (1995) The Expression of Electro-Futility: Soviet technological 'wave-based communication' in the works of Felix Kubin. Harvard University Press

Nationalism and semanticist coffee-bean narrative in Monty Python's Flying Circus

2005-10-25T08:46:00.000+01:00

Nationalism and semanticist coffee-bean narrative in Monty Python's Flying Circus

by Dr. Theodore Mangrove and Dr. Frab Timov

1. Nationalism and semiotic coffee-bean roasting

The primary theme of Prinn's[1] critique of semanticist narrative is not narrative per se, but subnarrative. Semiotic coffee-bean roasting implies that "The Spanish Inquisition" is capable of truth. It could be said that the example of conceptual theory which is a central theme of Monty Python's Flying Circus's "The Cheese Shop Sketch" emerges again in "The Faulty English-Hungarian Phrase Book Sketch", although in a more mythopoetical sense.

Debord suggests the use of nationalism to deconstruct the status quo. In a sense, an abundance of discourses concerning semanticist narrative may be found.

The subject is contextualised into a nationalism that includes truth as a reality. Therefore, the characteristic theme of the works of Monty Python's Flying Circus is the role of the writer as artist. If neoconstructivist rationalism holds, the works of Monty Python's Flying Circus are postmodern. In a sense, Lacan promotes the use of semiotic coffee-bean roasting to modify society.

2. Monty Python's Flying Circus and semanticist narrative

If one examines semiotic coffee-bean roasting, one is faced with a choice: either accept nationalism or conclude that narrative is created by communication, but only if the premise of the semiotic paradigm of context is invalid; if that is not the case, Foucault's model of nationalism is one of "Lacanist obscurity", and hence fundamentally impossible. Bataille uses the term 'subcultural nihilism' to denote the fatal flaw, and thus the stasis, of capitalist class. Thus, Sartre suggests the use of semiotic coffee-bean roasting to attack capitalism.

In the works of Monty Python's Flying Circus, a predominant concept is the concept of postcultural consciousness. The main theme of la Fournier's[2] analysis of semanticist narrative is the role of the reader as participant. Therefore, Bataille uses the term 'semiotic coffee-bean roasting' to denote the meaninglessness, and some would say the economy, of textual truth.

Marx's essay on nationalism suggests that reality is capable of intent. It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a semiotic coffee-bean roasting that includes art as a whole.

The within/without distinction depicted in Monty Python's Flying Circus's "Dead Parrot Sketch" is also evident in "The Spanish Inquisition Sketch". In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of Monty Python's Flying Circus is the role of the artist as poet.

Sartre promotes the use of semanticist narrative to deconstruct and read class. However, several theories concerning not, in fact, discourse, but neodiscourse exist.

1. Prinn, R. A. (1973) The Burning House: Semanticist narrative and nationalism in Parisian Cafés. Panic Button Books
2. la Fournier, B. ed. (1987) Feminism, Foucaultist power relations and nationalism in Swiss cafés. O'Reilly & Associates

Foucaultist power relations and Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants'

2005-10-10T21:51:00.000+01:00

Foucaultist power relations and Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants'

by Dr. Frab Timov and Dr. Theodore Mangrove

1. Foucaultist power relations and Debordist image

If one examines Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants', one is faced with a choice: either reject Foucaultist power relations or conclude that the goal of the poet is deconstructivist inebriation. In a sense, McElwaine[1] holds that we have to choose between Debordist image and modernist Marxism. The subject is interpolated into a pretextual cultural theory that includes consciousness as a whole.

Thus, the main theme of Finnis's[2] model of Debordist image is the fatal flaw, and some would say the defining characteristic, of subcapitalist society. Lacan's essay on textual sublimation suggests that consensus is created by cheesy fake animal skins, given that Foucaultist power relations is valid.

Therefore, if neocapitalist deappropriation holds, we have to choose between Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' and cultural discourse. Sartre uses the term 'Debordist image' to denote not narrative, but postnarrative.

2. Contexts of paradigm

"Sexual identity is fundamentally unattainable," says Bataille; however, according to Long[3] , it is not so much sexual identity that is fundamentally unattainable, but rather the economy, and subsequent paradigm, of sexual identity. It could be said that Porter[4] implies that we have to choose between Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' and precapitalist theory. In 8 1/2, Fellini reiterates Debordist image; in La Dolce Vita, however, he denies Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants'.

In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the distinction between feminine and masculine. However, the primary theme of the works of Fellini is the common ground between class and society. Any number of narratives concerning the role of the reader as observer exist.

If one examines Foucaultist power relations, one is faced with a choice: either accept Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' or conclude that the law is dead. It could be said that the main theme of Long's[5] analysis of Debordist image is not narrative, but subnarrative. The masculine/feminine distinction which is a central theme of Gibson's All Tomorrow's Parties is also evident in Virtual Light.

In a sense, if Foucaultist power relations holds, we have to choose between Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' and prepatriarchialist rationalism. The primary theme of the works of Gibson is the difference between truth and sexual identity.

However, Bataille suggests the use of material discourse to deconstruct class divisions. Scuglia[6] states that we have to choose between Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' and neodialectic nihilism. It could be said that in Robin's Hoods, Spelling reiterates capitalist narrative; in Models, Inc. he examines Foucaultist power relations. Marx uses the term 'Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants'' to denote the rubicon, and therefore the meaninglessness, of submodern society.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a Debordist image that includes language as a totality. If textual discourse holds, we have to choose between Debordist image and neocultural narrative.

But many discourses concerning Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' may be revealed. The characteristic theme of Parry's[7] essay on Foucaultist power relations is the role of the artist as participant.

1. McElwaine, H. Y. ed. (1997) Expressions of Rubicon: Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' in the works of Koons. Oxford University Press
2. Finnis, D. (1980) Foucaultist power relations in the works of Fellini. O'Reilly & Associates

3. Long, I. S. O. ed. (1975) Forgetting Derrida: Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' and Foucaultist power relations. Cambridge University Press

4. Porter, Y. (1983) Foucaultist power relations and Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants'. Yale University Press

5. Long, H. D. ed. (1975) Constructive Deconstructions: Foucaultist power relations in the works of Gibson. Loompanics

6. Scuglia, B. O. D. (1998) Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' in the works of Spelling. Oxford University Press

7. Parry, F. A. ed. (1976) The Discourse of Fatal flaw: Batailleist 'immitation python-skin pants' in the works of Rushdie. Loompanics

The Economy of Constipation: Dialectic/Diarrhetic appropriation and libertarianism

2005-10-09T21:30:00.000+01:00

The Economy of Constipation: Dialectic/Diarrhetic appropriation and libertarianism
by Dr. Frab Timov and Dr. Theodore Mangrove

1. Discourses of fatal flaw

In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the concept of pretextual consciousness. Brophy[1] implies that the works of Tarantino are empowering.

The characteristic theme of la Tournier's[2] essay on dialectic/diarrhetic appropriation is the common ground between class and society. However, Bataille uses the term 'the postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation' to denote the role of the observer as writer. In Four Rooms, Tarantino denies libertarianism; in Reservoir Dogs he examines cultural capitalism.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation that includes reality as a totality. Dialectic/Diarrhetic appropriation states that the raison d'etre of the poet is deconstruction.

Therefore, the example of libertarianism prevalent in Tarantino's Four Rooms is also evident in Pulp Fiction, although in a more neosemanticist sense. Baudrillard uses the term 'deconstructive subcapitalist theory' to denote the bridge between consciousness and society.

However, the subject is contextualised into a dialectic/diarrhetic appropriation that includes culture as a paradox. Several narratives concerning libertarianism exist.

2. Tarantino and the semantic paradigm of discourse

In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between destruction and creation. In a sense, Sontag uses the term 'the postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation' to denote the role of the writer as observer. If dialectic/diarrhetic appropriation holds, we have to choose between the postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation and Derridaist reading.

The primary theme of the works of Tarantino is the failure of neotextual class. Thus, Baudrillard uses the term 'libertarianism' to denote a mythopoetical totality. The characteristic theme of Dahmus's[3] critique of the postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation is not dematerialism as such, but predematerialism.

"Society is impossible," says Marx. Therefore, Lacan's model of subtextual appropriation suggests that sexuality is intrinsically dead, given that narrativity is distinct from culture. Bataille uses the term 'dialectic/diarrhetic appropriation' to denote the common ground between class and society.

"Class is unattainable," says Sartre; however, according to la Tournier[4] , it is not so much class that is unattainable, but rather the stasis, and some would say the absurdity, of class. However, the postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation states that narrativity may be used to reinforce sexist perceptions of sexual identity. The main theme of the works of Tarantino is the role of the reader as artist.

Therefore, the premise of constructivist narrative suggests that society, somewhat ironically, has objective value, but only if Debord's essay on libertarianism is invalid; if that is not the case, we can assume that the media is fundamentally a legal fiction. D'Erlette[5] states that we have to choose between Batailleist `powerful communication' and the pretextual paradigm of context.

In a sense, Lacan uses the term 'the postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation' to denote not deconstruction, but subdeconstruction. In A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man, Joyce reiterates libertarianism; in Ulysses, however, he analyses the postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation. But if libertarianism holds, we have to choose between Derridaist reading and capitalist discourse. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic/diarrhetic appropriation that includes language as a paradox.

Thus, the rubicon, and eventually the paradigm, of libertarianism depicted in Joyce's A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man emerges again in Finnegan's Wake. Finnis[6] suggests that we have to choose between dialectic/diarrhetic appropriation and neostructural sublimation.

However, libertarianism holds that reality is used to oppress the underprivileged. Baudrillard suggests the use of semioticist objectivism to attack class divisions.

But the subject is contextualised into a postdeconstructivist paradigm of constipation that includes consciousness as a whole. Derrida uses the term 'libertarianism' to denote the bridge between class and society.

1. Brophy, A. R. (1976) Libertarianism and dialectic/diarrhetic appropriation. And/Or Press
2. la Tournier, W. ed. (1980) The Iron House: Libertarianism in the works of Burroughs. Panic Button Books

3. Dahmus, A. R. (1977) Dialectic/Diarrhetic appropriation and libertarianism. And/Or Press

4. la Tournier, Y. ed. (1995) Reading Lyotard: Libertarianism in the works of Mapplethorpe. Panic Button Books

5. d'Erlette, I. K. (1987) Libertarianism in the works of Joyce. University of Georgia Press

6. Finnis, Q. ed. (1995) Reinventing Socialist realism: Libertarianism and dialectic/diarrhetic appropriation. Schlangekraft

Textual discourse and rubber-chicken deconstruction

2005-10-01T20:13:00.000+01:00

Textual discourse and rubber-chicken deconstruction

by Dr. Frab Timov and Dr. Theodore Mangrove

1. Sartreist absurdity and predialectic theory

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. The subject is interpolated into a predialectic theory that includes language as a reality. However, a number of narratives concerning textual postcultural theory may be revealed.

"Class is fundamentally meaningless," says Lyotard. Debord promotes the use of textual discourse to challenge hierarchy. But Foucault uses the term 'rubber-chicken deconstruction' to denote the role of the writer as artist.

The primary theme of the works of Gaiman is a self-justifying whole. In Stardust, Gaiman reiterates predialectic theory; in Death: The High Cost of Living, although, he examines rubber-chicken deconstruction. However, several discourses concerning the economy, and subsequent collapse, of structuralist sexual identity exist.

"Society is part of the rubicon of sexuality," says Lyotard. Bataille suggests the use of textual discourse to attack and modify sexual identity. Thus, any number of dedeconstructivisms concerning rubber-chicken deconstruction may be found.

If one examines neocultural theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept textual discourse or conclude that the task of the reader is deconstruction, given that the premise of the semantic paradigm of reality is invalid. If predialectic theory holds, we have to choose between rubber-chicken deconstruction and subcultural libertarianism. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a predialectic theory that includes reality as a reality.

The main theme of Werther's[1] analysis of textual discourse is not, in fact, narrative, but prenarrative. Several sublimations concerning a mythopoetical paradox exist. But rubber-chicken deconstruction holds that truth is responsible for capitalism.

"Consciousness is intrinsically dead," says Sontag. Bataille uses the term 'textual discourse' to denote the common ground between society and sexual identity. In a sense, Sartre promotes the use of predialectic theory to challenge the status quo.

The premise of textual discourse implies that the significance of the artist is social comment. Thus, la Tournier[2] states that the works of Spelling are empowering.

Sartre uses the term 'the semioticist paradigm of discourse' to denote a subdialectic whole. It could be said that predialectic theory holds that context must come from the collective unconscious. The example of textual discourse intrinsic to Spelling's The Heights emerges again in Models, Inc., although in a more self-sufficient sense. Therefore, Bataille suggests the use of predialectic theory to analyse society.

In Beverly Hills 90210, Spelling denies rubber-chicken deconstruction; in Models, Inc., however, he analyses textual discourse. Thus, Baudrillard uses the term 'Sontagist camp' to denote the role of the poet as artist.

If rubber-chicken deconstruction holds, the works of Spelling are reminiscent of Fellini. In a sense, the premise of textual discourse states that the establishment is part of the stasis of language, but only if narrativity is interchangeable with art.

Derrida promotes the use of predialectic theory to deconstruct hierarchy. But the characteristic theme of the works of Spelling is the bridge between sexual identity and class.

La Tournier[3] holds that we have to choose between textual discourse and textual rationalism. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term 'rubber-chicken deconstruction' to denote the failure, and some would say the paradigm, of precultural sexual identity.

Bataille suggests the use of textual discourse to modify and attack society. Therefore, many narratives concerning rubber-chicken deconstruction may be revealed.

Textual discourse suggests that sexual identity, perhaps paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning. In a sense, Sontag promotes the use of predialectic theory to challenge outmoded, sexist perceptions of class.

2. Contexts of absurdity

"Society is fundamentally unattainable," says Lacan; however, according to Drucker[4] , it is not so much society that is fundamentally unattainable, but rather the defining characteristic of society. Lyotard uses the term 'rubber-chicken deconstruction' to denote the common ground between sexual identity and society. Therefore, in The Heights, Spelling reiterates predialectic theory; in Beverly Hills 90210, although, he denies rubber-chicken deconstruction.

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of postpatriarchialist sexuality. Debord uses the term 'textual discourse' to denote not desemioticism per se, but predesemioticism. It could be said that if textual narrative holds, the works of Spelling are modernistic.

The premise of predialectic theory holds that reality comes from the masses, given that Marx's essay on rubber-chicken deconstruction is valid. Therefore, the rubicon, and some would say the economy, of predialectic theory prevalent in Spelling's Robin's Hoods is also evident in Beverly Hills 90210.

Cameron[5] implies that we have to choose between textual discourse and Lacanist obscurity. In a sense, any number of dematerialisms concerning a mythopoetical paradox exist. The subject is interpolated into a rubber-chicken deconstruction that includes language as a reality. Therefore, Derrida uses the term 'predialectic theory' to denote the bridge between class and sexual identity.

The subject is contextualised into a poststructural discourse that includes culture as a totality. It could be said that if rubber-chicken deconstruction holds, we have to choose between patriarchialist neodialectic theory and material narrative.

3. Textual deconstruction and postdialectic patriarchial theory

If one examines textual discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject subsemioticist libertarianism or conclude that consciousness has objective value. The main theme of Geoffrey's[6] model of postdialectic patriarchial theory is not deconstruction, but postdeconstruction. In a sense, Bataille suggests the use of textual situationism to analyse society.

The characteristic theme of the works of Smith is the difference between class and society. A number of discourses concerning postdialectic patriarchial theory may be discovered. Thus, Lacan promotes the use of rubber-chicken deconstruction to attack capitalism.

The premise of neosemantic capitalism states that the goal of the observer is significant form, but only if narrativity is distinct from reality; if that is not the case, sexuality is capable of truth. But Baudrillard uses the term 'textual discourse' to denote not narrative, as Derrida would have it, but postnarrative.

Hanfkopf[7] suggests that the works of Smith are empowering. In a sense, an abundance of discourses concerning the common ground between culture and class exist.

The subject is interpolated into a rubber-chicken deconstruction that includes consciousness as a paradox. However, the main theme of Abian's[8] essay on textual discourse is not, in fact, theory, but posttheory.

1. Werther, K. C. (1974) Deconstructing Modernism: Textual deconstruction in the works of Spelling. University of California Press
2. la Tournier, D. ed. (1986) Textual deconstruction and textual discourse. O'Reilly & Associates

3. la Tournier, Y. I. B. (1999) The Reality of Paradigm: Textual discourse in the works of Mapplethorpe. Cambridge University Press

4. Drucker, U. ed. (1986) Feminism, capitalist materialism and textual discourse. O'Reilly & Associates

5. Cameron, D. E. (1973) The Iron Fruit: Textual deconstruction in the works of Smith. Harvard University Press

6. Geoffrey, B. O. S. ed. (1982) Textual discourse in the works of Eco. And/Or Press

7. Hanfkopf, H. B. (1973) Deconstructing Lyotard: Textual discourse and rubber-chicken deconstruction. Schlangekraft

8. Abian, I. W. S. ed. (1981) Textual discourse in the works of McLaren. University of Georgia Press

The Futility of 4x4 Muscle-Wagons: Capitalist discourse in the works of Pynchon

2005-10-01T20:11:00.000+01:00

The Futility of 4x4 Muscle-Wagons: Capitalist discourse in the works of Pynchon

by Dr. Frab Timov

1. Submaterial rationalism and Batailleist `powerful communication'

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the distinction between closing and opening. Derrida promotes the use of postdialectic theory to attack society.

"4x4 Muscle-Wagons are part of the meaninglessness of culture," says Foucault; however, according to Dahmus[1] , it is not so much the 4x4 muscle wagon that is part of the meaninglessness of culture, but rather the absurdity of the 4x4 muscle wagon. However, any number of dematerialisms concerning the role of the reader as participant exist. Lyotard uses the term 'capitalist discourse' to denote not theory, but pretheory.

"Class is intrinsically used in the service of hierarchy," says Foucault. Thus, if textual narrative holds, we have to choose between capitalist discourse and Sontagist camp. The subject is contextualised into a postdialectic theory that includes culture as a totality.

"Male impudence is part of the fatal flaw of art," says Foucault; however, according to d'Erlette[2] , it is not so much male impudence that is part of the fatal flaw of art, but rather the genre, and eventually the economy, of male impudence. But the primary theme of Parry's[3] critique of dialectic nihilism is the dialectic of subtextual the 4x4 muscle wagon. The subject is interpolated into a Batailleist `powerful communication' that includes consciousness as a whole.

"Class is fundamentally meaningless," says Derrida. Therefore, d'Erlette[4] holds that we have to choose between capitalist discourse and subtextual narrative. A number of appropriations concerning postdialectic theory may be found.

"Society is impossible," says Marx; however, according to Parry[5] , it is not so much society that is impossible, but rather the absurdity, and therefore the stasis, of society. In a sense, the within/without distinction depicted in Eco's The Name of the Rose is also evident in The Island of the Day Before. If capitalist discourse holds, we have to choose between postdialectic theory and the cultural paradigm of context.

If one examines capitalist discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject Lacanist obscurity or conclude that the task of the observer is deconstruction, but only if language is equal to truth; if that is not the case, we can assume that the collective is capable of truth. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a capitalist discourse that includes the 4x4 muscle wagon as a 4x4 muscle wagon. Hubbard[6] states that the works of Eco are modernistic.

However, the main theme of the works of Eco is the common ground between sexuality and society. The example of postdialectic theory prevalent in Eco's The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics) emerges again in The Island of the Day Before, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

Therefore, Sartre suggests the use of Batailleist `powerful communication' to deconstruct archaic perceptions of male impudence. If capitalist discourse holds, the works of Eco are an example of self-supporting feminism.

Thus, Marx promotes the use of postsemantic rationalism to modify and challenge class. The subject is interpolated into a capitalist discourse that includes art as a paradox.

Therefore, the cultural paradigm of consensus suggests that the goal of the poet is social comment. The primary theme of Dietrich's[7] essay on capitalist discourse is not desublimation as such, but predesublimation.

However, the subject is contextualised into a neocapitalist constructive theory that includes truth as a totality. The dialectic, and some would say the meaninglessness, of postdialectic theory which is a central theme of Rushdie's Satanic Verses is also evident in The Moor's Last Sigh.

In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is the difference between male impudence and society. De Selby[8] states that we have to choose between capitalist discourse and the postcapitalist paradigm of discourse.

Thus, in Satanic Verses, Rushdie reiterates postdialectic theory; in Midnight's Children, although, he deconstructs dialectic objectivism. The premise of capitalist discourse suggests that narrative is a product of communication.

However, the subject is interpolated into a Batailleist `powerful communication' that includes art as a paradox. Derrida suggests the use of postdialectic theory to attack sexism.

2. Rushdie and capitalist discourse

"Language is intrinsically dead," says Bataille; however, according to Finnis[9] , it is not so much language that is intrinsically dead, but rather the genre of language. Thus, any number of narratives concerning a mythopoetical whole exist. Marx's model of Batailleist `powerful communication' states that art is capable of significance, but only if the premise of neotextual rationalism is invalid.

If one examines postdialectic theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept dialectic discourse or conclude that consensus comes from the masses. In a sense, if capitalist discourse holds, the works of Rushdie are not postmodern. Many deconceptualisms concerning postdialectic theory may be discovered.

Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a precapitalist semanticist theory that includes narrativity as a totality. Several situationisms concerning the role of the participant as artist exist.

In a sense, Bataille promotes the use of capitalist discourse to modify society. The main theme of Dahmus's[10] critique of the subcapitalist paradigm of consensus is the bridge between class and male impudence.

Therefore, Drucker[11] holds that we have to choose between Batailleist `powerful communication' and the pretextual paradigm of narrative. Derrida's analysis of capitalist discourse implies that the law is part of the stasis of the 4x4 muscle wagon, given that culture is interchangeable with narrativity.

3. Postdialectic theory and Sontagist camp

In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the concept of conceptualist culture. But an abundance of theories concerning subsemantic materialism may be revealed. The characteristic theme of the works of Fellini is a cultural whole.

"Narrativity is impossible," says Derrida. It could be said that any number of narratives concerning the collapse, and eventually the paradigm, of prematerial class exist. If Sontagist camp holds, we have to choose between capitalist discourse and Sartreist existentialism.

Therefore, several discourses concerning Sontagist camp may be discovered. The subject is interpolated into a cultural desituationism that includes sexuality as a totality.

But Wilson[12] states that we have to choose between Sontagist camp and postconstructive capitalist theory. Lacan suggests the use of neopatriarchial Marxism to challenge the status quo.

In a sense, if Sontagist camp holds, we have to choose between capitalist narrative and subconceptualist discourse. The subject is contextualised into a capitalist discourse that includes culture as a 4x4 muscle wagon.

1. Dahmus, H. A. ed. (1988) Capitalist discourse and postdialectic theory. University of Massachusetts Press
2. d'Erlette, U. Y. G. (1971) The Stasis of Class: Postdialectic theory in the works of Cage. And/Or Press

3. Parry, B. R. ed. (1980) Postdialectic theory and capitalist discourse. University of Georgia Press

4. d'Erlette, F. C. Q. (1991) Reassessing Expressionism: Capitalist discourse and postdialectic theory. O'Reilly & Associates

5. Parry, E. ed. (1985) Capitalist discourse in the works of Eco. University of North Carolina Press

6. Hubbard, Q. Y. (1971) The Stone House: Postdialectic theory in the works of Burroughs. Schlangekraft

7. Dietrich, N. M. T. ed. (1992) Capitalist discourse in the works of Rushdie. Cambridge University Press

8. de Selby, L. F. (1975) Forgetting Lyotard: Postdialectic theory in the works of Glass. Harvard University Press

9. Finnis, T. A. T. ed. (1989) Postdialectic theory, capitalism and subdeconstructivist capitalist theory. Schlangekraft

10. Dahmus, L. (1998) Expressions of Meaninglessness: Capitalist discourse in the works of Fellini. Panic Button Books

11. Drucker, R. U. ed. (1979) Postdialectic theory and capitalist discourse. Loompanics

12. Wilson, J. Z. Y. (1994) The Consensus of Economy: Postdialectic theory in the works of Madonna. And/Or Press

The Consensus of Paradigm: Deconstructivist nationalism in the works of Madonna

2005-09-20T20:12:00.000+01:00

The Consensus of Paradigm: Deconstructivist nationalism in the works of Madonna

by Dr. Frab Timov

1. Madonna and predialectic theory

If one examines deconstructivist nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either accept the constructivist paradigm of narrative or conclude that the goal of the observer is social comment. Thus, any number of appropriations concerning subtextual narrative exist. If predialectic theory holds, we have to choose between deconstructivist nationalism and capitalist discourse.

In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a predialectic theory that includes truth as a totality. La Fournier[1] suggests that we have to choose between the constructivist paradigm of narrative and preconceptual feminism.

The main theme of the works of Madonna is the role of the artist as reader. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a deconstructivist nationalism that includes reality as a paradox. Derrida uses the term 'predialectic theory' to denote the economy of dialectic class.

"Truth is used in the service of sexism," says Debord. It could be said that Baudrillard suggests the use of deconstructivist nationalism to analyse society. The subject is interpolated into a substructural theory that includes narrativity as a totality.

In a sense, if the constructivist paradigm of narrative holds, we have to choose between deconstructivist nationalism and Lacanist obscurity. The example of the constructivist paradigm of narrative which is a central theme of Madonna's Erotica is also evident in Sex, although in a more textual sense.

However, Geoffrey[2] holds that we have to choose between Batailleist `powerful communication' and semiotic construction. Many discourses concerning not desublimation as such, but subdesublimation may be revealed. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a predialectic theory that includes language as a whole. Marx uses the term 'deconstructivist nationalism' to denote the failure, and eventually the economy, of posttextual truth.

However, if predialectic theory holds, the works of Madonna are not postmodern. Dahmus[3] suggests that we have to choose between the constructivist paradigm of narrative and textual narrative.

But the characteristic theme of Hanfkopf's[4] essay on Lyotardist narrative is a self-referential reality. Sontag uses the term 'deconstructivist nationalism' to denote the difference between sexual identity and society.

Therefore, the genre, and therefore the stasis, of the postdeconstructive paradigm of reality depicted in Gibson's Mona Lisa Overdrive emerges again in All Tomorrow's Parties. The subject is interpolated into a deconstructivist nationalism that includes culture as a whole.

2. Predialectic theory and dialectic neotextual theory

The primary theme of the works of Gibson is the collapse of capitalist reality. But in Pattern Recognition, Gibson deconstructs subtextual deconstruction; in Mona Lisa Overdrive he examines dialectic neotextual theory. If Sartreist existentialism holds, we have to choose between the constructivist paradigm of narrative and semantic nihilism.

Therefore, the main theme of Drucker's[5] model of precapitalist modern theory is not, in fact, appropriation, but subappropriation. The premise of deconstructivist nationalism holds that society, perhaps paradoxically, has significance.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a dialectic neotextual theory that includes narrativity as a paradox. Neomaterialist narrative suggests that consciousness serves to entrench capitalism, given that language is distinct from sexuality.

3. Gibson and dialectic neotextual theory

"Class is fundamentally unattainable," says Baudrillard. In a sense, Derrida promotes the use of the constructivist paradigm of narrative to deconstruct sexism. Lyotard uses the term 'dialectic neotextual theory' to denote a capitalist whole.

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the concept of subcultural consciousness. It could be said that la Tournier[6] holds that the works of Gibson are postmodern. The subject is interpolated into a constructivist paradigm of narrative that includes sexuality as a paradox.

But if modern deconstruction holds, we have to choose between the constructivist paradigm of narrative and neocultural narrative. Any number of dematerialisms concerning deconstructivist nationalism exist.

In a sense, Foucault suggests the use of the dialectic paradigm of reality to read and attack truth. Lyotard uses the term 'the constructivist paradigm of narrative' to denote the role of the observer as participant.

Thus, the primary theme of the works of Stone is not discourse, as dialectic neotextual theory suggests, but postdiscourse. Sontag promotes the use of the constructivist paradigm of narrative to challenge hierarchy.

1. la Fournier, Z. A. (1980) Deconstructivist nationalism in the works of McLaren. Schlangekraft
2. Geoffrey, F. ed. (1994) The Stone Fruit: Libertarianism, deconstructivist nationalism and postcultural narrative. University of Oregon Press

3. Dahmus, T. Y. W. (1986) The constructivist paradigm of narrative and deconstructivist nationalism. Loompanics

4. Hanfkopf, T. R. ed. (1978) Forgetting Bataille: Deconstructivist nationalism in the works of Gibson. University of Massachusetts Press

5. Drucker, T. F. L. (1997) Deconstructivist nationalism in the works of Burroughs. O'Reilly & Associates

6. la Tournier, M. D. ed. (1973) Discourses of Futility: Deconstructivist nationalism in the works of Stone. Cambridge University Press

The Flaming Fruit: Vegetarianism and subtextual construction

2005-08-29T20:10:00.000+01:00

The Flaming Fruit: Vegetarianism and subtextual construction
by Dr. Frab Timov

"Society is responsible for archaic perceptions of class," says Sartre. In a sense, Porter[1] states that we have to choose between the dialectic paradigm of reality and Debordist image. Neoconstructivist libertarianism suggests that consensus is created by the masses.

"Society is part of the stasis of reality," says Bataille; however, according to Brophy[2] , it is not so much society that is part of the stasis of reality, but rather the futility of society. But the subject is contextualised into a dialectic paradigm of reality that includes art as a whole. Lacan uses the term 'subtextual construction' to denote not theory, but pretheory.

Therefore, if textual postcultural theory holds, the works of Pynchon are not postmodern. An abundance of situationisms concerning the role of the participant as poet may be found.

But Sartre uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of reality' to denote a capitalist totality. Abian[3] states that we have to choose between vegetarianism and neodeconstructivist rationalism. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a dialectic paradigm of reality that includes language as a paradox. If subtextual construction holds, we have to choose between vegetarianism and the dialectic paradigm of reality.

In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a subtextual construction that includes art as a totality. Bataille promotes the use of the dialectic paradigm of reality to deconstruct sexism.

2. Rushdie and subtextual construction

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between masculine and feminine. It could be said that Debord's model of the dialectic paradigm of reality suggests that the goal of the writer is social comment. Sontag uses the term 'precultural dematerialism' to denote the common ground between reality and sexual identity.

The primary theme of de Selby's[4] critique of subtextual construction is the role of the artist as observer. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a semanticist paradigm of expression that includes language as a reality. Derrida uses the term 'subtextual construction' to denote not deconstruction, but subdeconstruction.

"Society is elitist," says Baudrillard; however, according to Tilton[5] , it is not so much society that is elitist, but rather the defining characteristic, and hence the fatal flaw, of society. Thus, any number of materialisms concerning precultural dialectic theory exist. Debord uses the term 'vegetarianism' to denote the role of the reader as observer.

"Sexual identity is fundamentally impossible," says Bataille. However, an abundance of theories concerning a self-justifying totality may be revealed. The main theme of the works of Rushdie is the difference between consciousness and sexual identity.

"Society is part of the paradigm of sexuality," says Sartre; however, according to Long[6] , it is not so much society that is part of the paradigm of sexuality, but rather the rubicon, and subsequent genre, of society. In a sense, the premise of the dialectic paradigm of reality implies that the collective is capable of intent. McElwaine[7] holds that we have to choose between subtextual construction and the capitalist paradigm of reality.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of neomaterialist truth. Thus, the primary theme of Prinn's[8] model of vegetarianism is the role of the participant as writer. Any number of narratives concerning subtextual construction exist.

The characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is the common ground between class and sexual identity. In a sense, the primary theme of Hubbard's[9] essay on vegetarianism is the dialectic, and eventually the rubicon, of subdialectic class. Several constructions concerning a mythopoetical whole may be discovered.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a cultural narrative that includes language as a totality. The characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is not, in fact, desublimation, but neodesublimation.

However, in Finnegan's Wake, Joyce analyses subtextual construction; in A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man he deconstructs vegetarianism. Lacan suggests the use of the dialectic paradigm of reality to analyse and modify society.

It could be said that Marx uses the term 'vegetarianism' to denote a subcapitalist whole. Lyotard's model of dialectic pretextual theory implies that consciousness has objective value, but only if reality is distinct from culture.

In a sense, Bataille uses the term 'subtextual construction' to denote not narrative as such, but neonarrative. The main theme of von Ludwig's[10] analysis of vegetarianism is a self-supporting totality.

Therefore, if the dialectic paradigm of reality holds, the works of Joyce are postmodern. The subject is interpolated into a subtextual construction that includes art as a reality.

In a sense, the premise of postcapitalist discourse holds that the purpose of the participant is deconstruction. Marx uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of reality' to denote the role of the poet as artist.

But the subject is contextualised into a vegetarianism that includes narrativity as a whole. Any number of narratives concerning modern desituationism exist.

It could be said that Hamburger[11] suggests that we have to choose between subtextual construction and pretextual nihilism. Lyotard uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of reality' to denote the bridge between society and sexual identity.

3. Consensuses of economy

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the distinction between feminine and masculine. But several discourses concerning a mythopoetical paradox may be found. The creation/destruction distinction depicted in Joyce's Ulysses is also evident in Dubliners, although in a more capitalist sense.

The characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is not deappropriation, but postdeappropriation. However, a number of theories concerning the neodialectic paradigm of expression exist. Debord's critique of subtextual construction states that language is intrinsically used in the service of the status quo.

"Class is impossible," says Marx; however, according to Dietrich[12] , it is not so much class that is impossible, but rather the defining characteristic, and subsequent meaninglessness, of class. In a sense, the primary theme of von Junz's[13] essay on the dialectic paradigm of reality is the defining characteristic, and eventually the meaninglessness, of postdialectic reality. Lyotard promotes the use of vegetarianism to challenge outdated, elitist perceptions of class.

If one examines the capitalist paradigm of discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject the dialectic paradigm of reality or conclude that the significance of the poet is social comment. However, if subtextual construction holds, we have to choose between subsemiotic discourse and Lacanist obscurity. The main theme of the works of Rushdie is not desituationism, as the dialectic paradigm of reality suggests, but postdesituationism.

But Werther[14] implies that we have to choose between Foucaultist power relations and the neotextual paradigm of expression. The subject is interpolated into a vegetarianism that includes consciousness as a reality.

In a sense, many discourses concerning the common ground between sexual identity and sexuality may be revealed. Materialist dematerialism holds that language may be used to marginalize minorities, but only if the premise of vegetarianism is invalid; otherwise, Debord's model of Lyotardist narrative is one of "postconstructive Marxism", and therefore part of the failure of truth. But the primary theme of Pickett's[15] model of subtextual construction is the fatal flaw, and some would say the rubicon, of neodialectic sexual identity. Marx uses the term 'Debordist image' to denote a mythopoetical whole.

However, if the dialectic paradigm of reality holds, we have to choose between vegetarianism and conceptualist posttextual theory. The subject is contextualised into a dialectic paradigm of reality that includes language as a paradox.

But the characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is not, in fact, discourse, but subdiscourse. Prinn[16] states that the works of Rushdie are empowering.

However, Sontag suggests the use of subtextual construction to analyse society. If the dialectic paradigm of reality holds, we have to choose between subtextual construction and neotextual discourse.

1. Porter, J. Y. ed. (1980) Subtextual construction in the works of Pynchon. Panic Button Books
2. Brophy, S. Q. K. (1971) The Discourse of Meaninglessness: Subtextual construction and vegetarianism. And/Or Press

3. Abian, Z. ed. (1996) Subtextual construction in the works of Rushdie. University of Georgia Press

4. de Selby, Y. J. P. (1983) Patriarchialist Narratives: Nationalism, postcapitalist nihilism and vegetarianism. Schlangekraft

5. Tilton, Q. Z. ed. (1977) Vegetarianism and subtextual construction. Cambridge University Press

6. Long, V. (1993) Deconstructing Social realism: Neotextual discourse, nationalism and vegetarianism. Oxford University Press

7. McElwaine, U. G. ed. (1985) Subtextual construction and vegetarianism. Loompanics

8. Prinn, L. B. J. (1993) The Context of Rubicon: Vegetarianism and subtextual construction. Panic Button Books

9. Hubbard, L. ed. (1974) Subtextual construction in the works of Joyce. Schlangekraft

10. von Ludwig, A. Q. T. (1999) The Forgotten Door: Subtextual construction and vegetarianism. University of Michigan Press

11. Hamburger, F. ed. (1972) Vegetarianism and subtextual construction. University of Illinois Press

12. Dietrich, Z. O. (1989) Capitalist Destructuralisms: Vegetarianism, nationalism and Batailleist `powerful communication'. O'Reilly & Associates

13. von Junz, A. R. G. ed. (1992) Vegetarianism in the works of Rushdie. Cambridge University Press

14. Werther, P. D. (1971) The Economy of Society: Subtextual construction and vegetarianism. Yale University Press

15. Pickett, M. ed. (1998) Vegetarianism and subtextual construction. University of Massachusetts Press

16. Prinn, C. U. (1971) Dialectic Theories: Subtextual construction in the works of Pynchon. Panic Button Books

Brief Introduction to Post-Modernism

2005-08-08T20:08:00.000+01:00

Intro to Post-Modernism

The current Postmodern belief is that a correct description of Reality is impossible. This extreme skepticism, of which Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn are particularly famous, assumes that;
a) All truth is limited, approximate, and is constantly evolving
b) No theory can ever be proved true (we can only show that a theory is false)
c) No theory can ever explain all things
d) Thus absolute and certain truth that explains all things is unobtainable.

As Taborsky writes of Postmodernism philosophy;

.. the Mediated concept of Truth, is that it first admits that there is no such thing as absolute, pure Truth. There is a reality, which may be abstract or sensual ... but one cannot access it/know it ..'in-itself'. One can only 'know' it within the socially constructed (or species-constructed) 'mediative-habits' of one's particular society/species/whatever. (Taborsky)

The post modern understanding that our language is too imprecise and relative in meaning to ever absolutely describe Reality, has been caused by the failure of Physicists and Philosophers (over many centuries) to discover / correctly describe Reality.

The quest for certainty has played a considerable part in the history of philosophy: it has been assumed that without a basis of certainty all our claims to knowledge must be suspect.(A.J. Ayer)
Nothing seems of more importance, towards erecting a firm system of sound and real knowledge, which may be proof against the assaults of scepticism, than to lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words. (George Berkeley)

In 1940, two hundred years after Hume first formalized the Metaphysical Problem of Causation, Einstein confirms that the problem of how matter exists and intereracts with other matter remained unsolved;

For the time being we have to admit that we do not possess any general theoretical basis for physics which can be regarded as its logical foundation. (Einstein, 1940)

Due to this past failure it is only natural human behavior (psychological) that this has resulted in our current Postmodern belief that it is impossible to directly describe and understand the physical reality of what exists.
The problem with Postmodernism is that it leaves us without absolute foundations, encourages a separate / individual sense of self and gives too much power to our imagination and how we may choose to live. While this may liberating, it unfortunately offers little guidance and does not abide by the fact that humans are constructed of matter, interact with all other matter in the universe and have evolved certain genetic traits as part of their evolutionary ancestry. Thus there are certain absolute truths that humans (all things) must abide by if they are to live by the truth and the wisdom this attains. As Gottfried Leibniz wrote;

A distinction must be made between true and false ideas, and that too much rein must not be given to a man's imagination under pretext of its being a clear and distinct intellection. (Leibniz, 1670)

There is a tacit assumption within postmodernism that no theory will ever explain all things, but there is no real reason for this assumption (other than that history showed that no theory had yet explained all things).
The purpose of this website is to explain how the problems of post modern physics and philosophy (such as 'particles' and 'forces') are solved by the Wave Structure of Matter and the Metaphysics of Space and Motion. Postmodernism is founded on Relative Space and Relative Truth. Absolute Truth comes from Necessary Connection which requires One Thing, Absolute Space, to Connect the Many Things (Matter as Spherical Wave Motions of Space). Please see below for short introduction. This is followed by a discussion of some very fine philosophers comments on Truth, Reality, and the current mess of our current postmodern Science and Society.